Assessing Costs: Is Tin Cheaper Than Asphalt Roofing?

Asphalt shingles are initially less expensive but may need more upkeep, whereas tin roofing is more durable but costs more up front. Your budget and long-term requirements will determine which option is best for you.

Many people question if tin roofing is less expensive than asphalt roofing when weighing their roofing options. Since every material has unique benefits and financial repercussions, there is no simple answer to this question.

With prices ranging from $3.50 to $5.50 per square foot, asphalt shingles are frequently the preferred option for homes on a tight budget. Because of their low cost and simplicity of installation, asphalt shingles are a popular option for many. But because they usually survive 20 to 30 years, they may eventually need more regular replacements or repairs. Higher total expenses could result from this, particularly in regions with severe weather.

On the other hand, the initial cost of tin roofing, also known as metal roofing, which comprises different metals including steel and aluminum, is usually greater. Premium options like copper can cost up to $30 per square foot. Metal roofs are known for their longevity, often lasting 40 to 70 years with little upkeep, despite their original higher cost. They are a more economical, long-term option due to their resistance to corrosion, wind, and fire.

In the end, tin roofing offers long-lasting value and is therefore a better investment for homeowners who intend to remain in their homes for decades, even though asphalt is initially less expensive. Your decision hinges on striking a balance between long-term durability and value and immediate affordability.

For more information visit: Is Tin Cheaper Than Asphalt Roofing?


Manage My Roof

1 Blog posts

Comments